[1]陈轶嵩,马金秋,丁振森,等.纯电动汽车动力系统全生命周期节能减排绩效评价研究[J].机械与电子,2018,(11):20-23.
　CHEN Yisong,MA Jinqiu,DING Zhensen,et al.Research on Life Cycle Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Performance Assessment of Power System for Pure Electric Vehicle[J].Machinery & Electronics,2018,(11):20-23.
点击复制

纯电动汽车动力系统全生命周期节能减排绩效评价研究
分享到：

《机械与电子》[ISSN:1001-2257/CN:52-1052/TH]

卷:
期数:
2018年11期
页码:
20-23
栏目:
设计与研究
出版日期:
2018-11-24

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on Life Cycle Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Performance Assessment of Power System for Pure Electric Vehicle
文章编号:
1001-2257(2018)11-0020-04
作者:
陈轶嵩1; 2; 马金秋1; 丁振森1; 陈 昊1; 2
( 1.长安大学汽车学院,陕西 西安 710064; 2.交通新能源开发、应用与汽车节能陕西省重点实验室, 陕西 西安 710064 )
Author(s):
CHEN Yisong1; 2;  MA Jinqiu1;  DING Zhensen1;  CHEN Hao1; 2
(1.School of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China; 2.Transport New Energy Development,Application and Key Laboratory of Automobile Energy Conservation in Shanxi Province,Xi'an 710064, China )
关键词:
全生命周期评价;  纯电动汽车;  动力系统;  GaBi平台;  节能减排绩效
Keywords:
LCA;  electric vehicle;  power system;  GaBi;  energy saving and emission reduction
分类号:
U463.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
采用全生命周期评价(LCA)方法,基于GaBi平台建立了某燃油车车型改进而来的纯电动汽车的动力系统的全生命周期环境影响评价模型,将动力系统分为动力电池、驱动电机、控制装置和减速器4个关键部件进行清单分析,分别从原材料获取、生产制造、运行使用和报废回收等生命周期4个阶段进行节能减排绩效评价计算。评价结果表明,在全生命周期的4个阶段内,原材料获取阶段的矿产和化石能源消耗最多、使用阶段的环境影响值最大,其中以全球变暖潜值(GWP)影响最为显著; 报废回收阶段则在矿产资源的消耗、化石能源的消耗以及环境排放方面均产生了一定正效益。基于分析结果,提出了当前应采用优化电网结构、加大动力系统零部件回收等措施来降低纯电动汽车对生态环境的影响。
Abstract:
The LCA method was adopted to establish a full life cycle environmental impact assessment model for the power system of a pure electric vehicle based on the GaBi platform. The power system is divided into four key parts: power battery, driving motor, control device and reducer. The performance evaluation and calculation of energy conservation and emission reduction were carried out in the four stages of the life cycle, including raw material acquisition, production and manufacturing, operation and use, and scrap recovery, respectively.The evaluation results show that the mineral and energy consumption in the raw material acquisition phase is the largest, and the environmental impact value in the use phase is the largest, among which the global warming potential(GWP)impact is the most significant. Scrap recycling stage have produced some positive benefits. Finally, based on the analysis results, it was proposed to reduce the impact of pure electric vehicles on the ecological environment by optimizing the structure of China's power grid and increasing the recovery of parts and components of electric vehicle power systems.

参考文献/References:

[1] TAGLIAFERRI C, EVANGELISTI S, ACCONCIA F, et al. Life cycle assessment of future electric and hybrid vehicles: A cradle-to-grave systems engineering approach[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2016, 112:298-309.
[2] ZHAO Y, ONAT N C, KUCUKVAR M, et al. Carbon and energy footprints of electric delivery trucks: A hybrid multi-regional input-output life cycle assessment[J]. Transportation Research Part D Transport & Environment, 2016, 47(2016):195-207.
[3] 赵福全, 陈轶嵩, 刘宗巍,等. 考虑报废回收的汽车发动机全生命周期环境影响评价研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2016(12):189-193.
[4] 殷仁述, 成军浩, 杨沿平,等. 汽车零部件报废回收阶段污染物排放评价研究——以汽车电动座椅为例[J]. 中国科技论文, 2015, 10(7):772-776.
[5] 李娟. 纯电动汽车与燃油汽车动力系统生命周期评价与分析[D]. 长沙:湖南大学, 2015.
[6] 郭焱,刘红超,郭彬.产品生命周期评价关键问题研究评述[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2014, 20(05):1141-1148.
[7] NOSHADRAVAN A, CHEAH L, ROTH R, et al. Stochastic comparative assessment of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from conventional and electric vehicles[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20(6):854-864.
[8] 李东光. 废旧电池金属催化剂回收利用实例[M]. 北京:中国纺织出版社, 2010.
[9] WALKER P D, ROSER H M. Energy consumption and cost analysis of hybrid electric powertrain configurations for two wheelers [J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 146: 279-287.
[10] YUAN X, LI L. Energy and environmental impact of battery electric vehicle range in China [J]. Applied Energy, 2015,157:75-84.
[11] 张雷, 刘志峰, 王进京. 电动与内燃机汽车的动力系统生命周期环境影响对比分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2013, 33(3):931-940.
[12] GUINEE J B. Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7(5):311-313.
[13] 李娟, 杨沿平, 陈轶嵩,等. 铝合金与铸铁缸盖的生命周期评价对比分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(11):5642-5648.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-07-06
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(71173072); 陕西省自然科学基金(2017JQ7003); 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(310822171001、310822170661)
作者简介:陈轶嵩(1988-),男,陕西周至人,工学博士(后),讲师,研究方向为新能源汽车全生命周期评价。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-24